When Gebran Bassil’s Goons Don’t Understand Freedom of Speech

Breaking news: Gebran Bassil turned out to be yet another racist Lebanese politician. I have no idea how this piece of news was in any way a surprise, but over the past few days it’s almost the only thing people are talking about, apart from the fact that our phones now need Maps updates in order to skip the roads where garbage bags have started to take up lanes.

The details are as follows:

A few days ago, Gebran Bassil’s twitter account was quoting a speech he was giving in the United States to an audience of Lebanese expats ($10 says they’re voting for Trump in 49 days). In that speech, Bassil dropped the following:

The speech excerpts translate to:

  • I support giving Lebanese women who marry foreigners the right to pass on their nationality to their children but our constitution and societal fabrics don’t allow to give the Lebanese nationality to 400,000 Palestinians.
  • I support the law that allows Lebanese women to pass on their nationality to their children, with the exception of Syrians and Palestinians to maintain our land.

Of course, it has probably escaped Bassil in that moment that St. Maroun, after whom his sect was named, was Syrian and Jesus, after whom he prays, was Palestinian, but that’s besides the point. Certainly, however, Bassil wouldn’t have had a problem if those Syrians and Palestinians weren’t mostly Muslim. I wonder, how different would his statement have been had those refugees been mostly Christian like him? I can imagine him now, à la Oprah, distributing nationalities left and right: YOU ARE LEBANESE, YOU ARE LEBANESE, YOU AAAAAALL ARE LEBANESE!

Context to Bassil’s tweets, however, remains important. His statements do not come from void. They emanate from a public sentiment that has only managed to gain popularity over the past few years with around 2 million Syrians seeking refuge in Lebanon. Of course, as is the case with Lebanon’s statistics, numbers do not exist. But it wouldn’t be far-fetched to assume that Bassil’s speech is not at odds with what the prevalent majority of Christians believes to be true, and a sizable portion of Lebanon’s Muslim community.

Yet again, the sentiment in the aforementioned denominations arise from their incessant need for self-sectarian preservation and are devoid from any national affinity towards a more global Lebanese state. Either way, I digress.

The uproar towards Bassil’s statements has been deafening. Human Rights Watch issued a statement whereby they found what he said to be abhorrent, in contradiction to the international treaties that Lebanon has signed in regards to women rights, and shameful to come from the minister of foreign affairs who is, whether we like it or not, the face of Lebanon to the world. Sorry #LiveLoveBeirut, you’re not it.

A slew of tweets and Facebook posts criticizing Bassil were also widely circulated, of which the satirical Facebook page Adeela led the forefront with a bunch of posts addressing Bassil’s tweets:

Lebanese blogger Mahmoud Ghazayel had a tweet (now deleted) in which he corrected Bassil’s statement to this:


So far so good, right? Except this didn’t remain as just a manifestation of Lebanese online degrees of freedom because before you knew it, the situation – thanks to massive reports by Bassil’s online henchmen – became as follows:

Every single post that criticized Bassil about his racist tweets was removed because of Facebook reports, while the social media platform never bothered to check for the background upon which those reports were being filed in the first place, or the statements being criticized to begin with.

As a result, if you try and say something negative about Bassil’s statements, thousands will end up putting you in Facebook jail for at least 24 hours because you somehow violated the terms of being on that website, by simply expressing an opinion.

Maybe it’s fear of  exposing how ridiculous Bassil’s proposition – even if echoed by many – is. Maybe it’s wanting to keep his image pristine in their eyes, albeit it being irrevocably damaged in the minds of many others. Maybe it’s them wanting to keep a semblance of pride.

What Bassil’s goons seem to fail to grasp is that with every post they manage to bring down, ten more will spring up in their place. As it is their right to believe and want to defend what Bassil said, it is the right of every other Lebanese who categorically and irrevocably disagrees to not only criticize but mock those statements until kingdom come, whether they like it or not.

As the stench of garbage and filth overtakes their nares in every cubic meter of air in Beirut, as they spend countless hours without electricity, as they pray for the heavens for internet to be fast enough to load the images in this post, as they debate whether to flush or not because water is scarce, let them have all of that pride and the politicians whose image they want to keep. Let them have their “holy” land, their “better-than-thou” attitude towards anyone and anything they deem lesser. Because at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter how many Facebook reports are issued, common sense will prevail.

PS: Dear Facebook, re-assess yourself, why don’t you? 


5 thoughts on “When Gebran Bassil’s Goons Don’t Understand Freedom of Speech

  1. Gosh, this raises so many questions and honestly like with everything from Gebran Bassil and his corner I don’t think these guys have properly thought through anything they’re saying:

    1) I know several Lebanese Christian women in the US who are married to American Jewish men. Is Gebran Bassil willing to give the children of these women Lebanese citizenship (let’s ignore for now the problematic scenario of naturalizing children but presumably not spouses)? If so, what happens when these children visit Lebanon, encounter adverse anti-Semitism, and start to complain about it as they grow older? What recourse would they have to basically try to legally ensure their civil rights? Besides, even if Gebran Bassil thanks to his largesse and magnanimity is willing to naturalize these people as Lebanese citizens, would he in fact be able to make it happen or would it get bogged down until eternity in the mess that is the Lebanese political/bureaucratic establishment? Who is Gebran Bassil after all to be able to make something like this happen? What branch of government is he even in, the executive or the legislative?

    2) Speaking of the legislative branch of government, never mind that stupid remark about “societal fabrics” which is entirely frivolous and non-binding (and only exists to signal a political “dog whistle” to witless, conservative, Lebanese oppositionists), that other remark about the constitution might be pertinent here. Can anyone here comment on how Lebanese immigration law works and how it remains “constitutional”? Is there meat to what Gebran Bassil is saying here or as I suspect is he just expelling hot air? It would seem extremely odd and peculiar to have specific verbiage about “Palestinians and Syrians” in founding legal documents like the Lebanese Constitution (and even odder for it not to have been repeatedly legally challenged by now), and besides, from what I understand, although I admit I’ve never read the document, there is no specific mention of religious confessions in the Lebanese Constitution (never mind that whole informal thing about the president needing to be Maronite, the Prime Minister Sunni and the Speaker of the House Shiite). Is there even a judicial branch of government that arbitrates this stuff, culminating in an institution akin to a Supreme Court?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Gebran is a fool, yes. But on this issue he’s right.

    Syrians and Palestinians (who are both refugees) total more than the actual Lebanese population in Lebanon. Passing this law will create a huge imbalance.

    All I’m reading is virtue signaling. People want to feel “modern” and “western”.

    Whether your accept this reality or not, like it or hate it but all political power is based on demographics. It has nothing to do with racism.

    The only reason politicians want this law passed is because that increases their voting power. And the only reason politicians reject it is because it renders them irrelevant.


  3. As Randy said, Gebran is a fool, but this subject is way out of hand and isn’t racist at all.

    Now you see, I used to read your articles. After this one, you seem to be an ignorant, arrogant and illogical person. Here’s why:

    – The unemployment rate in Lebanon is so high compared to its population growth. Now add millions of Syrian refugees and half a million of Palestinians. Once you give them citizenship, they have the right to work as much as anyone else – Of course they will tease job owners with their acceptance of low salaries.

    I am completely against Gebran in his political views, but this… This is an agreement every single politician knows, good or bad, corrupt or not, it’s impossible to give citizenship to Syrians and Palestinians. Others are accepted? You know why? Because they aren’t in MILLIONS!


  4. Sergio and Randy,

    Relax guys, you’re debating a strawman! Nobody has proposed that Lebanon naturalize “millions” of Syrian and Palestinian refugees. What is being debated here is whether Syrians and Palestinians should be arbitrarily excluded from the list of foreigners whom Lebanese women can marry and still pass Lebanese citizenship down onto their children! It’s a real stretch to conflate what is actually being debated here with what you apparently have construed is being debated, which to me at least is testament to how truly sensitive a subject this is!


  5. Pingback: Why Donald Trump Is Probably Part-Lebanese | A Separate State of Mind | A Blog by Elie Fares

Leave a Reply to Sergio Moubarak Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s