Titanic 3D – Movie Review

15 years later, the 3D version of Titanic is here, with a few days remaining until the centennial anniversary of the ship’s demise. Can you believe it has been 15 years since Titanic was released? In my head, it feels like only a few years ago that I was a little boy amid the hype of Titanic where every single person I know was talking about that movie.

84 years after Titanic sank on its maiden voyage, an old woman named Rose (Gloria Stewart) sets to tell her story as treasure hunters search for a diamond necklace named “The Heart of the Ocean,” believed to be last seen aboard the ship. In 1912, Rose’s earlier self (Kate Winslet) is a rich first-class girl, engaged to Cal Hockley (Billy Zane) who wants nothing of her but to be his trophy wife. Feeling suffocated after boarding Titanic, the most luxurious ship at the time, she tries to jump off deck, only to be stopped by Jack Dawson (Leonardo Dicaprio). “You jump, I jump” is the line. Soon after, Rose and Jack strike a young romance that blossoms over the coming days, until Titanic meets its fate when it hits an iceberg and goes down in the Atlantic abyss, taking the lives of 1500 out of its 2200 passengers with it.

The last time I had watched Titanic was 1998. So I was revisiting it with more or less a blank slate – what I remembered was very minimal. And the movie managed to surprise me in 2012, as it must have done in 1998. Leaving your prejudice aside – the fact that Titanic became such a talked-about movie doesn’t mean it’s a bad movie to begin with. It wouldn’t have won 11 Oscars and went on to become one the highest grossing movies of all time (the highest grossing movie of all time, in fact, for over 12 years) had it been a bad movie. But as it is with pop culture, the more popular something becomes, the more people feel they need to oppose it to have a relevant opinion. This is the case with Titanic.

The thing about Titanic is that it is still a ground breaking movie, even today. Leave the cheesy love story aside, you can’t but be taken in by how detailed James Cameron’s portrayal of the ship is. He actually built a 90% to scale replica, down to the most minute of details: the stairs, the porcelain china, the chairs, etc. That level of precision never goes unnoticed. The 3D conversion only serves to intensify that. Many movies are hurt by being converted to 3D. Titanic is not. The conversion contributes to immersing you in its feel, making you part of what was happening on the ship as it sailed to its doom – the ship snapping in half, the people swimming, trying to fight for their life, only to be left as frozen corpses; the sense of despair, injustice and ultimately life – all of these are increased. The 3D conversion doesn’t take away from the movie’s value. It doesn’t cheapen it with silly gimmicks. It adds depth.

Kate Winslet and Leonardo Dicaprio’s roles have become iconic over the years. Titanic is the movie that propelled a 21 year old Dicaprio and a 20 year old Winslet at the time to the status they are in today. Billy Zane, on the other hand, has never managed to shake off the image that Cal gave to him. In fact, Titanic’s screenplay, which in typical Cameron fashion gets weak at some points with redundant lines and flagrant loopholes (which you actually notice this time around), is held together by the strength of its cast, relatively unknown people at the time, making the screenplay’s weaknesses irrelevant somehow. 15 years later, you can’t really write a critique of their performances that gives them justice. And in retrospect, the Academy Awards have really messed up by not nominating Dicaprio for best actor at the time.

Titanic‘s musical score is still among my favorite movie scores, even 15 years later. James Horner’s Hymn to the Sea has to be one of the most chilling compositions produced for a movie. Hearing Titanic‘s music, with its Scottish influences and maritime feel, in a movie theatre cannot but be considered an experience in itself.

My advice for you is to check your prejudice at the door and give this movie a very needed second chance. Odds are you’ll be surprised. At the end of the day, it’s really difficult not to sympathize with the ordeal the characters go through and the magnitude of the tragedy on screen. Titanic, the movie that broke boundaries in 1997, doesn’t feel outdated in 2012 – in fact, it actually feels current and much better than most movies being released nowadays. As that final scene rolls, you can’t but feel absorbed in Titanic. Seeing the sight of the ruined ship and thinking about all the lives lost with it will stay in your thoughts long after your take off your 3D glasses. Titanic has the same effect on audiences as it had 15 years ago and that is the mark of a great movie.

9/10

American Reunion – Movie Review

Almost 10 years after the last American Pie movie, the original cast is back for their high school reunion, 13 years after graduating – and all the characters have grown up.

Jim Levenstein (Jason Biggs) & Michelle (Alyson Hannigan) are still married and are now parents to a two year old boy. Their sex life, however, is in a rut and they’re trying to rekindle their romance.

Oz (Chris Klein) is now a hotshot famous sports anchor, dating a model who’s too out there for his taste. And he hasn’t gotten over his first love Heather (Mena Suvari).

Kevin Myers (Thomas Ian Nicholas) is now a work-from-home architect, married to a woman named Ellie. At the reunion, he’ll be tormented by feelings for his first love Vicky (Tara Reid).

Finch (Eddie Kay Thomas) is supposedly a man going on worldwide adventures – from Europe to South America, via Dubai and China.

On the other hand, Steven Stiffler (Seann William Scott) hasn’t done much growing up in the past 13 years. Stifmeister is still as is.

As the original characters go back to East Great Falls, they’re struck by how things have changed, and somehow how so much is still the same. The kid Jim used to babysit is now a young flirtatious woman trying to find the right man to lose her virginity to. The jocks are still jerks. In a way things are very similar to how they were – there’s one catch: they have grown up.

The opening scene sets the tone. American Reunion is hilarious. Yes, it’s cheap comedy. Yes, it uses sex to make you laugh. Yes, it’s inappropriate at times. But you just can’t stop laughing during that movie. Call it lame, call it useless, call it a silly relaunching of a franchise, it still does what American Pie does best: deliver a raunchy comedy.

The best thing about American Reunion is that it doesn’t straddle the lines of sentimentality as some franchises tend to do after a long absence. Instead, it keeps going at you with the same formula that made the first three movies successful: sex jokes, raunchy attitudes, lude behavior, nudity, awkward parent-son conversations. It is formulaic in a way, but no one expected it to be otherwise. Some of the jokes may have been done before, such as Jim’s masturbating scenes and talks with his father that divulge way too much information – you know such scenes are coming but you can’t help but laughing when they do.

How I Met Your Mother fans will be happy with a cameo appearance by Neil Patrick Harris. Fans of the “Stiffler’s mom” storyline won’t be disappointed as well, as Jennifer Coolidge makes an appearance. Many secondary characters are also given their own moments to keep you entertained.

People change, priorities get reshuffled, relationships get rearranged – but American Reunion sets to show that true friendship stays. And for one weekend, those friends will say “the hell with growing up” and have the time of their life, one last time. If you’re a fan of the first three movies, then American Reunion is definitely for you. Even if you haven’t watched any of the first American Pie movies, you won’t go into this not getting what it’s about. The characters that were desperately trying to lose their virginity 13 years ago have come a long way, and yet in a way have gone nowhere at all. This is one reunion worth attending.

7/10

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, Part 2 – Trailer: Bella as a Vampire

Here you go:

It looks like they’re toning down the “love story” approach for the promotion of this final movie and moving more into “Bella is now a vampire” realms.

Perhaps this is the smarter way to approach the final (and most useless) installment in the Twilight story. The final book, to begin with, has nothing going on. It’s a brick (about 800 pages) where Edward and Bella get married and have sex. She gets pregnant and delivers after a record-speed pregnancy during which she almost dies so he turns her. When she wakes up, they have more sex. The baby is thought to be a baby vampire and the rest of the movie is them preparing for a battle… that doesn’t happen. Diplomacy for the win!

Sorry for ruining it for you. Not really.

No, I won’t be watching it when it comes out.

No, it won’t be a good movie.

No, the trailer is not representative of the content of the movie.

Yes, it will make a lot of money.

In a nutshell, watching this movie will hurt your eyes and ears. Caution is advised.

The Hunger Games Breaks Box Office Records – Sets Huge Debut

$155 million.

That’s how much The Hunger Games has grossed in its opening weekend, enough to place it third on the best opening weekends list of all time, behind Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 and The Dark Knight. The Hunger Games has, therefore, grossed more on its opening weekend than any other non-sequel movie ever made.

That’s even more than the $142 million Twilight: New Moon made on its opening weekend. Here you go, yet another reason as to why The Hunger Games is not Twilight.

The appeal for the movie has been attributed to an array of factors ranging from the critical acclaim the movie has amassed, the high interest fueled by an engaging marketing campaign, the fandom of the books, to the wide range of audience that have seen it: interest was high among both female and male viewers.

The Hunger Games has also become its studio’s biggest hit ever in just three days. The previous best for Lionsgate was $116 million for Fahrenheit 9/11.

The next installment in the books Catching Fire is slated for a November 2013 release. With the reception this one has gotten, Catching Fire will be a volcano.

The Hunger Games is NOT Twilight

I had no intention to write such a post. But when I saw people on various platforms saying that The Hunger Games is just another Twilight, I simply had to step in to say no. Just no. And I think I am a qualified person to make the comparison. How so? Well, I’ve actually read both book series before the hype for their movies set in.

1 – The Books

There is a drastic difference between the themes of the books to begin with. The Hunger Games does not have supernatural human beings, let alone vampires or werewolves that have been so ruined in their portrayal that they’ve become a common source for jokes. The main characters of The Hunger Games are not driven by their incessant need to be loved but by their primal instinct for survival. Both may be intended for young adults and have a central female character but when it comes to the plot, protagonists and reception, the two series couldn’t be more different. Twilight is a fantasy love story, while The Hunger Games is an adventure about survival. That alone create a huge difference in the central elements of the book: where characters in one search for a boyfriend, the characters in another prepare for a revolution.

This brings me to point 2.

2- Katniss Everdeen and Bella Swan:

Bella’s struggles in Twilight is to choose between the sparkly vampire Edward and the transform-at-will werewolf Jacob. Her character is also nauseatingly one dimensional, useless and completely infatuated with mundane things, making her unlikeable.

Katniss is the exact opposite. Where Bella had things handed for her on a silver platter (boyfriend trouble don’t count as life problems), Katniss has to survive a world where the government has made the people hungry, where her mother is disconnected from the world and where she has to care for her only sister. Katniss’ world does not revolve around a boy, unlike Bella.

Bella is driven by her infatuation with Edward. Katniss is driven by her need to survive a cruel world. Katniss is a character young readers should look up to. Bella Swan is not.

3 – The Movies

Both movie series are turning out to be immensely popular. The Hunger Games has grossed over $25 million from midnight screenings alone. Twilight movies have broken records. Where they differ, however, is in the drastic critical reception. The Hunger Games has an aggregate score of more than 90% of positive reviews. Every single Twilight movie has been certified rotten by critics. You can read my review of The Hunger Games here. I didn’t even find it in me to review the latest Twilight movie. Enough said.

Perhaps both The Hunger Games and Twilight can be considered as a “teen” series. How that’s a bad thing, I’m not sure. The difference remains that one is absolutely relevant to what we’re living through today: revolutions, war, famine while the other lives in lala land. The fact remains that people need to get it in their heads that not anything that rings true with young adults needs to be compared with a preceding cultural phenomenon. Twilight was compared to Harry Potter. The Hunger Games is being compared to Twilight. How ridiculous, I know. When will such unfounded thoughts end? I have no clue.