The July 2012 Kourah By-Elections: When the Concept of Democracy Escapes the SSNP

Fadi Karam posters are everywhere on the North Lebanon highway

12 days from now, the northern caza “Al Kourah” is going to have a round of elections to elect an MP to replace Farid Habib, who passed away from cancer back in May.
The build up to the elections was interesting to watch. The first question that came up on the political scene soon after the parliementary seat became vacant: would elections take place?

The LF, who had previously won the seat, decided that their party will proceed with the elections. Therefore, based on their new internal laws, consultations took place with high ranking officials of their base in Kourah and they chose Fadi Karam, a dentist and former head of the Order of dentists in North Lebanon.

Soon after Karam was chosen, the SSNP decided that this is a direct confrontation for them. Why’s that? Because Karam is from their base town Amyoun. They considered it as a direct challenge from the LF for them to nominate someone from Amioun. They, therefore, decided to have a candidate run for the Kourah elections. Not because they wanted to. But because they were “forced” to by a blatant act of defiance.

What the SSNP seems to have totally evaded is the concept of democracy. The notion that in an election people who meet certain legal criteria can run regardless of where they are from is not in the SSNP directory. I guess Antoun Saadeh missed that part in whatever party principles they are obviously not following.

I wonder, had the LF nominated someone from Dhour el Shweir, wouldn’t they have considered it an act of defiance as well? Better yet, had the LF nominated someone from Bterram, another town in Kourah where the SSNP have great influence, wouldn’t they have considered it an act of defiance too?

Why hide behind lame excuses when you want to test the ground for the 2013 elections as much as your opponent?

The SSNP also declared that they would have had no problem letting the elections go for a win by default for a lone candidate  had the LF kept their candidate in MP Farid Habib’s family by either nominating his wife or son. Apparently they believe the seat “belongs” to that family since it was only taken from them by death.

Now I have to ask the SSNP, where was this “we respect the dead” attitude when Amin Gemayel was running against an unknown FPM candidate for the seat vacated by the assassination of his son in Metn? Or does it only apply in places where the chance of the SSNP winning are next to none?

Yes, their candidate has no chance of winning in Kourah.

Moreover, why should the concept of a seat belonging to a “family” be even a part of the discussion to begin with? The seat belongs to the citizens of Kourah. It would be a grave insult to their rights not to have the correct path of electoral democracy take place and have one candidate thrown on them forcibly just because some parties are too afraid to lose inexistant momentum a year before the 2013 parliemntary elections.

As part of their campaign, the SSNP are also busy reminding the voters of el Kourah about the LF’s militia past – about how the LF (and the LF alone) killed their sons and children way back when. Let alone the fact that this is nowhere near true (the SSNP had its fair share of atrocities done all across Lebanon and them pretending otherwise would be an a insult to voters’ intelligence), but what good does it do to bring forth into the conversation a civil war people shouldn’t even take into consideration with their votes anymore?

Does the SSNP even know that Fadi Karam was not a militant with the LF during the civil war? Do they know he rose among the ranks of the party after Samir Geagea was released from prison in 2005? Do they know he represents a rising class of LF politicians and enthusiasts who absolutely have nothing to do with the war?

Yet the SSNP is throwing a war Karam had nothing to do with on his shoulders. If you can’t beat them at the polls, beat their reputation with lies, obviously.

In a democratic country like Lebanon – regardless of what you think about this type of democracy – making a big deal out of the village a candidate was born in is unacceptable. Making a big deal of having been “forced” into elections is unacceptable. Making a big deal out of everything but the issues at hand is unacceptable.

You don’t want to run for elections? Then don’t. Don’t whine endlessly about irrelevant reasons for you deciding to run.

Come July 15th, the citizens of Kourah have such a clear choice in front of them it’s even silly to point it out. But regardless, what July 15th should and will be is a triumph for democracy and freedom over the concept of hate and cowardice.

Advertisements

16 thoughts on “The July 2012 Kourah By-Elections: When the Concept of Democracy Escapes the SSNP

  1. Thanks a lot for this article, well written. I read a few articles about this but as usual it is quite puzzling for an outsider. I have a question though. Aren’t the principles of the SSNP with regards to Lebanon as an entity tantamount to sedition?

    Reply
    • The SSNP calls for the unity of Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Palestine and Syria (as well as Cyprus) in one nation: the fertile crescent with its star being Cyprus.

      Reply
      • and Kuweit and Ahwaz (Iran) , Kilikiya and some land from Turkey (ISkandarouna and Hatay…) and the Sinaa desert.

        If you read Antoun Saade Book that he wrote in 1939 (نشوء الأمم) he don’t mention anything about Iraq or Kuwet or Ahwaz…, but the re-editing done by the SSNP members in 1951 (after his death) they integrate these lands !!!!!! even though Saadeh never mentions them 🙂

        Reply
  2. I don’t care about this elections to be honest. It’s irrelevant and people are reading way too much into it. But I agree that the SSNP are being melodramatic about this.
    Just nominate your guy and run an electoral campaign and be done with it. It won’t affect the balance of powers in parliament. It won’t change anything before 2013. It’s just muscle flexing.

    Reply
    • Many echo your sentiments from what I’ve seen. They just want July 15th to go by smoothly. But the point was that the SSNP needs to tone down the discourse and run for elections in a democratic way.

      Reply
  3. nicely said, as a voter in Koura I first wasn’t excited about voting, but after seeing how SSNP are handling the matter of the election I decided to vote for Fady Karam specialy after I saw him as an intellectual and respected guy with some sort of a program contrary to the SSNP candidate, and I think most of my town and koura’s residence (except few remaining SSNP ) will vote LF. and a slogan in going out in Koura now saying: Vote for Lebanese note for syrians 🙂

    Reply
    • By-elections don’t usually produce the stir that full blown elections do. But this one is proving to be quite interesting to watch. You summed it up quite well and I think you’ve made the best choice. I’m not a voter in Koura, although I am from the North (my grandma is from Koura :P), but regardless of political opinions the way the campaigns are being done would be enough to sway my vote.

      Reply
  4. Pingback: The Kourah July 2012 By-elections: What It Is & What It Isn’t « A Separate State of Mind | A Lebanese Blog

  5. I don’t get why you would mention a guy that died decades ago concerning a pathetic matter caused by corrupt officials… If you’ve ever read any of Saadeh’s writings, you’d know he wasn’t a fan of democracy during his reign. Which would have been acceptable given the time frame his party took rise…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s