As a person who grew up and went through a French curriculum with Victor Hugo’s novel as its centerpiece at many points, I’ve grown attached to the essence of the novel. I’ve also grown to understand it, know what it contains, understand the message that Hugo wanted to pass on. I’d even joke and say the novel’s impressive spine is a byproduct of Hugo being French – a lot of blabbing for nothing. I’ve taken some of that, as is evident by my wordy blogposts at times. This review will surely turn into one so just skip to the last paragraph if you don’t feel like reading.
My knowledge of Victor Hugo’s most famous 1500-pages novel has led me to conclude that it’s very difficult to turn it into a motion picture. If the previous attempts at this novel weren’t enough proof, Tom Hooper’s take on Les Misérables adds to the growing list of not-nearly-there trials.
The story is known for everyone by now. Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman) is a French man living around the time of the French revolution and is forced to steal a loaf of bread to save a relative’s life. He is subsequently thrown in jail for 19 years at the end of which he’s released on parole. Valjean, however, breaks his parole and ends up making a decent life for himself as the mayor of a small French town in Northern France called Montreuil-sur-Mer. But Javert (Russell Crowe), the prison warden who was in charge of Valjean, appears back in his life during a visit to the factory run by Valjean, now working under a new name. In that factory works a single mother called Fantine (Anne Hathaway) who gets sacked from her job when her secret of having had a child out of wedlock, Cosette (eventually played by Amanda Seyfried), is discovered. Fantine eventually succumbs to becoming a prostitute and is saved by Valjean who promises to take care of her daughter as he runs away from Javert who’d do anything to catch him, to the backdrop of a growing revolution in the streets of the French youth.
Tom Hooper’s Les Misérables is a full-blown musical. No, it’s not a musical in the sense of a talking movie with a few songs interspersed here and there. It’s a musical in the sense of three hours non-stop singing where even “thank you”s are sung, where reading letters becomes melodic and where, if you’re not a fan of musicals to begin with or not entirely sure what you’re getting yourself into, you’d end up wanting to pull your own hair out. Yes, this version of Les Misérables is definitely not for everyone. Even if you love – scratch that – adore music, Les Misérables might prove a very tough pill to swallow. And at times it really, really is.
Hugh Jackman, who can sing, ends up grating around the 120th minute mark. Russell Crowe on the other hand entirely sheds his Gladiator image for a singing Javert and with his not-so-pleasant singing voice ends up entirely intolerable a few minutes in. Russell Crowe even looks entirely uncomfortable to be there and it reflects on his character, making Javert – a central figure to the story – comical at times. Hugh Jackman has to be commanded for a job well done as Valjean. Few actors can say they can deliver performances as he did with the close-ups he got throughout the movie.
In fact, the actors and actresses in Tom Hooper’s Les Misérables all performed their songs in the movie live. While a piano played in the background to guide them, they acted their songs instead of recording them months in advance and eventually lip-synching them to film.
The single acting performance in the movie that will absolutely blow your socks off is Anne Hathaway, who’s probably aided by the fact that her character isn’t there for long. Hathaway, as Fantine, is brilliant. She deserves all the praise she’s been getting. Her performance of the Susan-Boyle-made-famous song “I Dreamed A Dream” is gut-wrenchingly stunning. She brings the life into her character and gives Fantine a richness which other actors in this movie with more running time couldn’t bestow upon theirs. Hathaway steals every scene she’s in and ends up being the only reason you might walk out of this movie feeling like you hadn’t wasted three hours of your live. Just to watch her do what she does so beautifully. No one is raining on Hathaway’s parade come Award-season time.
Interesting casting choice include Samantha Barks as Eponine, the daughter of the Thénardiers, played by Helena Bonham Carter and Sasha Baron Cohen whose only purpose was to add some comic relief to some tense moments. Barks sings her songs really well and gets you to relate to her character, despite the background. She delivers a nice rendition of “On My Own.”
Les Misérables does have its strong moments, notably the opening scene, Hathaway’s minutes and the ending, but the movie accumulates a lot of off-moments as well that make the result very lopsided. The movie is also extremely long. Thirty minutes (of wailing – singing) could have easily been cut with the story not be affected because few of those songs tell us more about the character and its story, an example being I Dreamed A Dream in which Fantine tells the story of how she reached the misery she was in. The overall result is a movie that feels very in limbo: okay, not great, this is awesome, this is horrible, goosebumps, kill me now. These are all things you will feel while watching Les Misérables.
3.5/5 – – new rating system.
I don’t think I can take 3 hours of this.
LikeLike
Totally understandable. I almost fell asleep a bunch of times throughout.
LikeLike
I wish I could’ve fallen asleep, but the sound was too loud, and my female companions were loudly weeping…along with ALL the other women in the movie theater. Definately not a fun experience. Not worth the $5 spent on my ticket. Every other straight man younger than 60 will probably agree.
Question for Elie: French education, Arab home; why the Anglophone blog? 🙂
LikeLike
No one cried around me! I had a bunch of French-educated students discussing the book while the movie rolled so I snapped at them and that was it.
I think if a person enjoyed the play (just checked parts of it on YouTube), they’d enjoy the movie. They are essentially the same.
Arab country, Joey? 😛
LikeLike
Heh, you’re not a “Phoenicianist, are you? 😉
LikeLike
I’m one of those ‘Lebanonists’ – the people who refuse cultural identities that my country has nothing to do with forced upon it.
LikeLike
Do you not consider yourself or Lebanon to be Arab?
LikeLike
Of course I don’t.
LikeLike
Don’t mean to hijack your blog post, I apologize, just one more question. So, do you consider the Lebanese state to be mult-ethnic (Arab, Armenian, Syriac, etc.)?
LikeLike
It is, isn’t it?
LikeLike
Then what ethnicity do you claim?
LikeLike
I’m Lebanese. And if you want something that works with Americans, perhaps Caucasian?
LikeLike
It was a beautiful movie!
LikeLike
If you like musicals 😛
LikeLike
It is a great musical masterpiece. I was watching/listening to the concert on YouTube afterwards. If you’d enjoy it as a musical concert, you’d enjoy the movie.
LikeLike
The movie is more turning the play into a motion picture than turning the book into one, which in my opinion is a grave mistake.
LikeLike
NIce review! Most of the people I’ve talked to said they thought Crowe did a poor job and, while I thought he wasn’t as good as Jackman, I didn’t think he did THAT bad. Maybe I’ll have to pay more attention to it the next time I see it.
And for the record, I am one of those people who loves musicals, and I had a hard time with this one at times too. I thought it was done well, I just had a hard time with close to the whole thing being in song. It just got tiresome after awhile…
LikeLike
I’m actually surprised that a lot of my friends are enjoying the movie. Many of them are not familiar with the story though so that might be helping. I don’t think Crowe was that bad but he was definitely lacking. My friend actually thought he was a highlight 😛
Thank you for reading.
LikeLike
Pingback: 2013 Oscar Predictions | A Separate State of Mind | A Lebanese Blog